Ghatfan Ghanoom was born in Homs, Syria in 1976 and lived between Homs and the Syrian capital of Damascus. After graduating from the Art Academy of Moldavia in 2006, he returned to Syria to work in the field of film directing.
After leaving Syria in 2014 due to the regime’s brutal response to the Syrian revolution calling for freedom and dignity, Ghanoom spent the next 10 years making the acclaimed documentary The Bad Son which creatively depicts the profound paradoxes and enduring spirit of the Syrian people’s fight for justice and freedom.
Ghanoom recently spoke to SYRIAWISE from his home in Finland where he now lives with his wife Wafaa and daughter Mira.
SYRIAWISE: Your film highlights significant paradoxes, such as the transformation of the “bad son” into a patriot. What message do you hope these paradoxes convey to your audience?
Ghatfan Ghanoom: The transformation of the “bad son” into a patriot is a fundamental part of the film’s narrative, embodying the deep paradoxes that characterize the human experience under oppression. Through this transformation, I aim to convey that the labels imposed by authoritarian regimes are often arbitrary and misleading. In the eyes of a repressive system, those who challenge the status quo are considered “bad” or “troublemakers.” However, these individuals are often the ones who love their country the most and are deeply committed to justice and freedom. This paradox highlights the resilience and courage required to stand up to tyranny. By presenting this journey, I want the audience to understand that true patriotism is not blind loyalty to the regime but a brave commitment to principles of justice, freedom, and human dignity. It’s a call to reevaluate how we define loyalty and love for one’s country and to recognize the bravery in dissent and standing up for what is right, even at great personal cost.
SYRIAWISE: Including satirical scenes, such as those of Assad Junior, adds a unique dimension to the documentary. How did you decide which satirical elements to include, and what is their purpose?
Ghatfan Ghanoom: Incorporating satirical scenes of Assad Junior was a deliberate choice, driven by the need to highlight the absurdity and hypocrisy of the regime. Satire is a powerful tool for criticism, providing a means to expose the failures and contradictions of the system without resorting to direct condemnation. The decision on which elements to include was guided by their ability to convey these criticisms succinctly and effectively. We aimed to select moments that would resonate with the audience, showcasing the stark contrast between the regime’s propaganda and the reality experienced by ordinary Syrians.
The purpose of these satirical elements is multifaceted. First, they provide a moment of levity in an otherwise intense and emotionally charged narrative, giving the audience a brief respite while keeping them engaged with the film’s themes. Second, satire allows for more nuanced criticism, as it can highlight the absurdity of the regime’s claims and actions in a way that direct criticism might not achieve. By using humor and satire, we invite the audience to question and reflect on the absurdity of the regime’s narrative, fostering a deeper understanding of the complexities of living under a dictatorship.
SYRIAWISE: The film also employs flashbacks to link past brutality with the present. Can you speak about your decision to use this narrative technique and its impact on storytelling?
Ghatfan Ghanoom: Flashbacks allowed us to draw parallels between historical events and current struggles, demonstrating how tactics of fear, oppression, and violence have remained consistent across generations under the Assad regime.
This approach profoundly impacts storytelling by creating a layered narrative that highlights the cyclical nature of tyranny in Syria. It helps the audience see that the current conflict is not an isolated event but part of a long-standing continuum of resistance against an entrenched repressive system. By weaving past and present together, we provide historical context that deepens the viewer’s understanding of the ongoing struggle and emphasizes the resilience of those who have fought for freedom across different eras.
The emotional and psychological impact of this continuity is also significant, as viewers witness the enduring effects of dictatorship on individuals and communities. Flashbacks serve as a reminder that the scars of past brutality shape the present and that the fight for justice and dignity is a lasting legacy passed down through generations.
SYRIAWISE: Your wife Wafaa Ameli, wrote the screenplay. What was it like working with her and how did her background and perspective influence the development of the film?
Ghatfan Ghanoom: Working on the film with my wife Wafaa Ameli was a transformative experience. Wafaa’s background in engineering brought a unique analytical and methodical approach to storytelling, significantly influencing the structure and depth of the documentary. Her ability to tackle problems systematically and her attention to detail ensured that every aspect of the screenplay was meticulously crafted and thoroughly considered.
Wafaa’s perspective as a partner and someone with a deep connection to the subject matter added layers of authenticity and emotional impact to the narrative. Her commitment to capturing the essence of our experience and the broader struggle against oppression was evident in her dedication to research and insistence on honesty and accuracy. She brought a rigorous approach to fact-checking and a keen eye for detail, ensuring that the narrative was compelling and credible.
The collaboration process between us was dynamic and complementary. We spent countless hours discussing and debating various aspects of the story, from key themes to the specifics of individual scenes. Our different backgrounds – my expertise in filmmaking and her expertise in engineering – complemented each other, creating a balance between artistic vision and structural integrity. Wafaa’s analytical mind provided solutions to narrative challenges, while my creative intuition pushed us to explore new storytelling techniques.
A specific example of Wafaa’s impact is the narrative structure of the film. Her ability to see the big picture while planning each detail helped us craft a coherent and emotionally impactful story. She also played a crucial role in developing character arcs and ensuring that personal stories were seamlessly woven into the broader historical and political context.
Her background also brought a level of empathy and emotional intelligence to the screenplay, which was essential in handling such sensitive material. Wafaa’s dedication to honoring the voices of those affected by the regime’s brutality was evident in her careful and respectful approach to their stories. She ensured that the narrative was not only powerful but also respectful and dignified.
In short, the collaboration process was a blend of our strengths, with Wafaa’s meticulous attention to detail and analytical thinking providing a solid foundation for my creative and artistic drives. Together, we were able to create a deeply impactful and cohesive documentary that reflects the complexities of our subject matter and the passion behind telling our story.
“Drawing parallels between the Assad regime and other oppressive regimes is a deliberate strategy to highlight the global patterns of authoritarianism and the shared experiences of those who resist it.”
Ghatfan Ghanoom
SYRIAWISE: The film draws parallels between the Assad regime and other oppressive regimes. What do you hope viewers take away from these comparisons?
Ghatfan Ghanoom: Drawing parallels between the Assad regime and other oppressive regimes is a deliberate strategy to highlight the global patterns of authoritarianism and the shared experiences of those who resist it. Through these comparisons, I hope viewers gain a broader understanding of the mechanisms of repression and the common threads in the struggles for justice and freedom worldwide.
One of the key lessons I hope to convey is the recognition that the fight against tyranny is not confined to Syria alone. It is a global issue, with similar struggles occurring in various parts of the world. By showing the similarities between different regimes, we aim to foster a sense of global solidarity and a shared purpose among those who stand up for human rights and democracy.
These comparisons also serve to highlight the resilience and courage of those who resist oppression, regardless of their location. By showcasing the commonalities in these struggles, we want to inspire viewers to see the interconnectedness of their actions with the broader fight for justice. The hope is that viewers feel a sense of responsibility to support these efforts, recognizing that the pursuit of freedom and human dignity is a global endeavor that requires collective action.
Furthermore, by drawing these comparisons, we aim to shed light on the recurring nature of authoritarian tactics, such as propaganda, surveillance, and suppression of dissent. Understanding these patterns can empower viewers to recognize and challenge such tactics in their contexts, whether they are in positions of influence in policy-making, engaging in activism, or simply raising awareness within their communities.
Ultimately, the goal is to evoke a sense of empathy and solidarity, encouraging viewers to stand with those fighting against oppression and contribute to the ongoing global struggle for human rights and freedom.
“Internationally, the film has opened many eyes to the realities of the Syrian struggle, fostering greater understanding and empathy among audiences who may not have been fully aware of the situation.”
Ghatfan Ghanoom
SYRIAWISE: How has the response to the film been so far, both locally and internationally? Are there any particular reactions or comments that have stood out to you?
Ghatfan Ghanoom: The reception of The Bad Son has been overwhelmingly positive, both locally and internationally. Locally, the film deeply resonated with those who have lived through the depicted events, providing them with a sense of acknowledgment and recognition. Many viewers expressed their gratitude for bringing their stories to light and for portraying the complexities of their experiences in an authentic and respectful manner.
Internationally, the film has opened many eyes to the realities of the Syrian struggle, fostering greater understanding and empathy among audiences who may not have been fully aware of the situation. One reaction that stood out was from a viewer who said the film profoundly changed his understanding of Syria. He noted that personal stories have the power to illuminate broader political conflicts and that “Bad Son” succeeded in making him feel connected to the human side of the Syrian revolution.
Another notable comment came from a film festival where the documentary was screened. One of the jury members remarked on the film’s ability to convey the emotional and psychological burden of repression while maintaining a sense of hope and resilience. They appreciated the film’s balance between the raw, unflinching portrayal of violence and its powerful message of resistance and courage.
Additionally, the film sparked discussions about the role of art and storytelling in activism, with many viewers expressing a renewed sense of purpose and commitment to supporting human rights efforts. The positive reception reinforced our belief in the importance of telling these stories and the impact they can have in raising awareness and inspiring action.
Overall, the feedback has been a testament to the film’s ability to engage diverse audiences and evoke a profound emotional response, encouraging viewers to reflect on their roles in the fight for justice and freedom.
“In the context of the Syrian revolution, films like The Bad Son can drive tangible change by raising awareness, inspiring action, and keeping the conversation about Syria alive.”
Ghatfan Ghanoom
SYRIAWISE: How do you see the role of art and cinema in activism, especially in the context of the Syrian revolution? Can films like “The Bad Son” drive tangible change or awareness?
Ghatfan Ghanoom: Art and cinema play a crucial role in activism by humanizing political issues and evoking empathy. In the context of the Syrian revolution, films like The Bad Son can drive tangible change by raising awareness, inspiring action, and keeping the conversation about Syria alive. They serve as powerful tools for documenting history, challenging narratives, and galvanizing support for justice and human rights.
Films have a unique ability to transcend language and cultural barriers, reaching a wide and diverse audience. By telling personal and compelling stories, films can create an emotional connection that statistics and news reports often fail to achieve. This emotional connection is essential in fostering empathy and understanding, which are critical for motivating people to take action.
Films like “Bad Son” can also serve as historical records, preserving the truth of what happened in Syria for future generations. They provide a platform for voices that might otherwise go unheard, giving a face to the struggle and highlighting the human cost of political conflict. This visibility is crucial in ensuring that the plight of Syrians is not forgotten and that the international community remains informed and engaged.
Moreover, by highlighting the similarities between the Syrian regime and other oppressive systems, the film can inspire a sense of global solidarity and shared purpose among activists and human rights advocates. It can encourage viewers to see their struggles reflected in the Syrian experience and recognize the importance of supporting one another in the fight against repression.
In terms of tangible change, films can influence public opinion and policy by raising awareness and sparking discussion. They can inspire grassroots movements, encourage donations to humanitarian efforts, and pressure governments to take action. While a single film may not change the world overnight, it can be a catalyst for broader movements and a part of the larger tapestry of activism and advocacy.
In summary, art and cinema are powerful tools for activism, capable of raising awareness, inspiring action, and preserving the truth. Films like “Bad Son” play a vital role in the ongoing struggle for justice and human rights in Syria and beyond.
SYRIAWISE: Reflecting on the ten-year journey to make this film, what were some of the most challenging moments you faced, and how did you overcome them?
Ghatfan Ghanoom: The ten-year journey to make the Bad Son was filled with challenges, both personal and professional. One of the most difficult challenges was the constant threat of danger. Working under the scrutiny of a repressive regime meant that every step of the production had to be carefully planned to avoid detection. The fear of arrest, violence, or even death was ever-present, creating a tense and stressful working environment.
Another significant challenge was the emotional toll of recounting and reliving the traumatic experiences that form the backbone of the documentary. Conducting interviews with survivors, witnesses, and those who had lost loved ones was profoundly painful. Being a witness to their suffering and reliving my experiences of repression and violence was emotionally draining. There were moments when the weight of these stories felt overwhelming, and it was difficult to find the strength to continue.
Additionally, the technical and logistical aspects of filming in a war-torn country posed numerous obstacles. The lack of stable infrastructure and the constantly shifting landscape of the conflict meant that we had to be flexible and adaptable in the face of these challenges.
Overcoming these challenges required a deep sense of purpose and a commitment to the importance of telling this story. The support of my collaborators, including Wafaa, was invaluable. Her strength, dedication, and unwavering belief in the project provided the emotional and practical support needed to navigate these difficult moments. The solidarity and courage of the Syrian people, who continued to resist despite enormous risks, were also a source of inspiration and motivation.
Ultimately, it was the belief in the power of this film to make a difference that kept us going. Knowing that we were giving a voice to the voiceless and preserving the truth of what was happening in Syria provided the strength to overcome the obstacles we faced. The ten-year journey was arduous and filled with hardships, but it was also a testament to the resilience and determination of everyone involved in the fight for justice and freedom.
SYRIAWISE: What do you hope viewers take away from watching “The Bad Son”? Is there a specific call to action or reflection you wish to evoke in your audience?
Ghatfan Ghanoom: From watching The Bad Son, I hope viewers gain a deep understanding of the complexities and human cost of the Syrian revolution. I want them to see beyond headlines and statistics to grasp the personal stories of those who have suffered and resisted under Assad’s regime. I hope the film evokes a profound sense of empathy and connection with the Syrian people, inspiring viewers to reflect on the global struggle for justice and human dignity.
“I encourage viewers to support organizations and initiatives that work to provide aid and advocate for human rights in Syria”
Ghatfan Ghanoom
The specific call to action I wish to evoke in the audience is multifaceted. First, I want viewers to feel compelled to raise awareness about the ongoing situation in Syria. Sharing the film, discussing it with others, and keeping the conversation alive are crucial steps to ensure that the plight of Syrians is not forgotten. Public awareness and pressure can influence political and humanitarian responses, making a tangible difference in the lives of those affected.
Secondly, I encourage viewers to support organizations and initiatives that work to provide aid and advocate for human rights in Syria. Whether through donations, volunteering, or other forms of support, there are many ways to contribute to the ongoing efforts to bring relief and justice to the Syrian people.
Finally, I hope the film inspires viewers to consider their roles in the fight against oppression and injustice. Whether in their communities, countries, or on a global scale, everyone has a part to play in defending human rights and standing against tyranny. The resilience and courage of the Syrian people can serve as a powerful example of the impact of collective action.
In summary, The Bad Son is a call to action for empathy, awareness, and active support. It is a reminder that the struggle for justice and freedom is a shared responsibility and that each of us can contribute to making a difference in the world.
